Black River Stages Results
- Crazyswede
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 4540
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:53 pm
- Nickname: Mongo
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 97
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
- Crazyswede
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 4540
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:53 pm
- Nickname: Mongo
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 97
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
- Crazyswede
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 4540
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:53 pm
- Nickname: Mongo
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 97
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
- formulasaab
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:36 am
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 0
- Location: Wilmington, DE
- Contact:
Crazyswede wrote:somebodies ball joint looks fubar in this shot:
Luke,
You've probably already thought of this but the conversation hasn't gone there yet so...
The ball joint failure suggests you hit the bumpstop. Yes?
1. One way to look at that is to figure the spring rate and/or ride height was too low for this particular rally/stage/yump.
If you look at it that way and decide to raise ride height and springrate, you have to accept that it can have a negative effect on your handling and stability. As a racer, I understand how this may not be acceptable to you.
2. Another way is to accept that sometimes you can take a particularly hard hit on a single wheel that just completely overcomes your springs and shocks. If that rock coming off the yump was the culprit, then that's basically what happened I guess.
Going with that reason however, means you've come to a point where you have to decide if you want your ball joint to break first, or your A-arm?
If it were me, I'd much prefer to use the ball joint as a "fuse" than the A-arm! The ball joint is a three-fastener fix and as shown by the photos, doesn't always break "all the way". That allows you to finish the stage and not have to deal with "floppy wheel" syndrome.
Of course, you could always put a lot of TEM (time/effort/money) into developing a "soft hit" hydromechanical bump stop... Similar to a tiny little Mtn Bike shock mounted in place of the rubbers.
Also of course, I literally have no idea what your current bump stop setup looks like. I only know what the stock ones were. So, I could be talking out my ass and not know it until the stink comes back at me.
- Geoff
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:31 pm
- Nickname: Geoff
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 6
- Location: Nude Humpshire
Luke and I talked about some ideas. He has that cool Jag ball joint with bolts on either side of the ball. That will help with some of the loading. Plus the car really needs progressive rate springs. And he is only running a 60mm bump stop and is thinking about getting some longer progressive ones. I think doing all 3 of those should really help a bunch.
The kind of dirty that doesn't wash off
- formulasaab
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:36 am
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 0
- Location: Wilmington, DE
- Contact:
Stefan,
I definatly agree about the spring rate part. I am very hesitant to go to a stiffer spring on gravel. A spring in rally is always a compromise, must be soft enough to provide good grip on small irregularities and firm enough bottom on only the hardest hits. The problem is we have got much faster and we are just hitting things harder than before. Thats where a progressive spring would be ideal, unfortunatly true progressive springs are very expensive.
I have always worried about the integrity of the upper ball joint, which is why I had a jaguar ball joint already sitting on my workbench.
My thinking is that if I make a couple design changes such as: stronger ball joint system, longer more progressive bump stop and maybe a slightly stiffer spring I should be ok, hopefully.
-Luke
I definatly agree about the spring rate part. I am very hesitant to go to a stiffer spring on gravel. A spring in rally is always a compromise, must be soft enough to provide good grip on small irregularities and firm enough bottom on only the hardest hits. The problem is we have got much faster and we are just hitting things harder than before. Thats where a progressive spring would be ideal, unfortunatly true progressive springs are very expensive.
I have always worried about the integrity of the upper ball joint, which is why I had a jaguar ball joint already sitting on my workbench.
My thinking is that if I make a couple design changes such as: stronger ball joint system, longer more progressive bump stop and maybe a slightly stiffer spring I should be ok, hopefully.
-Luke
- formulasaab
- Posts: 81
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 8:36 am
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 0
- Location: Wilmington, DE
- Contact:
Luke wrote:Thats where a progressive spring would be ideal, unfortunatly true progressive springs are very expensive.
Even for the coil-overs? Hmm. I wouldn't have thought. But then, I've never looked. It's probably the long-travel thing. "Lowering" progressive rate springs are probably cheap as dirt.
How about stacking two (short and cheap) different rate springs on top of one another?
- Crazyswede
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 4540
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:53 pm
- Nickname: Mongo
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 97
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests