So my 1991 now that it's converted to a manual seems to be sitting about 2" higher than it did... Checked EPC, and yep, the turbo/automatic springs are indeed different.
Anyway, the car is used for road use, it almost feels tipsy! anyone think I'm crazy to cut a coil out to correct how high it's sitting? Anyone have any other suggestions? The thing rides nice off road and the thing is very hard to bottom out, but it's sitting so high the on road / highway performance is not acceptable, and the alignments off too... So, should I break out the saw?
1991 Turbo / Automatic springs
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:54 pm
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 9
- Location: Pennsylvania, Forever!
- Contact:
1991 Turbo / Automatic springs
Less brake more gas!
- Crazyswede
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 4540
- Joined: Fri Sep 22, 2006 3:53 pm
- Nickname: Mongo
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 97
- Location: Vermont
- Contact:
-
- Posts: 1193
- Joined: Sat Mar 31, 2007 9:54 pm
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 9
- Location: Pennsylvania, Forever!
- Contact:
that was what I was thinking... The stiffness is not really an issue it does ride pretty smooth with these and it did before the conversion too, but sat at the correct height with the extra heft of the automatic. They are not progressive rate springs being that it's an OG 900 so removing a coil should only affect ride height. (or am I not thinking right?)
I actually have a set of SPG front springs, but all the rear ones I have are sagged out. It would probably have a rather funny stance with front SPG springs and stock turbo/automatic rear springs. Also keep in mind this was a $100 car, I'd prefer not to spend $200+ on springs.
I actually have a set of SPG front springs, but all the rear ones I have are sagged out. It would probably have a rather funny stance with front SPG springs and stock turbo/automatic rear springs. Also keep in mind this was a $100 car, I'd prefer not to spend $200+ on springs.
Less brake more gas!
-
- Posts: 151
- Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2007 1:30 pm
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 0
- Location: south-east--PA
- Contact:
I knew 1 guy out here that cut 1 coil off of his springs instead of paying for springs. As far as I know this did not cause any issues.
I understand it's not the best practice in the world but why not give it a try.
Ian
I understand it's not the best practice in the world but why not give it a try.
Ian
1-97 Impreza L wagon w/many mods--mine
1-C900 turbo w/290K--mine
4-C900 turbo's in various states--dads
1-Legacy wagon--dads
1-Forester--moms
1-C900 turbo w/290K--mine
4-C900 turbo's in various states--dads
1-Legacy wagon--dads
1-Forester--moms
-
- Posts: 442
- Joined: Thu Nov 09, 2006 6:50 pm
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 2
- Location: Rain City
For a cheap-o car, I'd say cut 'em, but don't cut the bottom ends. Saab springs have a "dead" coil at each end -- they are wound flat -- to allow the springs to sit properly in their perches.
Additionally, if you cut off a dead coil, you will change the ride height without appreciably changing the rate.
Also, the ratio between the ride height and the spring compressed length is 2:1 in the front, and, for all intents and purposes, 1:1 in the rear. IOW, change the compressed length a half-inch up front and you'll change the ride height by 1 inch; cut off a half-inch in the rear and you'll change the ride height by a half-inch.
Additionally, if you cut off a dead coil, you will change the ride height without appreciably changing the rate.
Also, the ratio between the ride height and the spring compressed length is 2:1 in the front, and, for all intents and purposes, 1:1 in the rear. IOW, change the compressed length a half-inch up front and you'll change the ride height by 1 inch; cut off a half-inch in the rear and you'll change the ride height by a half-inch.
My co-driver used to have a SAAB 900. He bought it with a bad tranny and put a new 5 spd in it. He cut the springs on the front and it made a nice difference in the handling for zero cost.
My experience is that SPG springs actually raise the rear of the car a bit. They are similar free length but are much stiffer than std springs.
Also, using only the front SPG springs with std rears results in a very nice balance for rougher roads.
My experience is that SPG springs actually raise the rear of the car a bit. They are similar free length but are much stiffer than std springs.
Also, using only the front SPG springs with std rears results in a very nice balance for rougher roads.
- Geoff
- Team Turbo Troll Crew
- Posts: 3890
- Joined: Fri Oct 20, 2006 3:31 pm
- Nickname: Geoff
- Number of Saabs currently owned: 6
- Location: Nude Humpshire
wierd, I didn't know that about the front springs.
My former daily driver was an '86 notchback automatic that I put SPG springs with spacers (1" of spacers in the front, about 1.5" in the rear - all I could fit). It felt like getting into a truck. It felt tall but it still took just about the same speed as the 9K Aero (with the same tires on both cars).
Cutting your springs will increase the spring rate - even if you're cutting the squared end of the coil (squared is the term that refers to the last coil being turned towards the previous coil for a flat end). But you may like the way it handles. Personally I'd just add some spacers to the rear
My former daily driver was an '86 notchback automatic that I put SPG springs with spacers (1" of spacers in the front, about 1.5" in the rear - all I could fit). It felt like getting into a truck. It felt tall but it still took just about the same speed as the 9K Aero (with the same tires on both cars).
Cutting your springs will increase the spring rate - even if you're cutting the squared end of the coil (squared is the term that refers to the last coil being turned towards the previous coil for a flat end). But you may like the way it handles. Personally I'd just add some spacers to the rear
The kind of dirty that doesn't wash off
Return to “SAAB MOTORSPORT TECH”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests